Lalita v. Vishwanath: Supreme Court on Evidentiary Value of FIR in Criminal Cases
The Supreme Court examined the evidentiary value of FIR in cases involving allegations of abetment to suicide and cruelty under IPC.
Adv. Anita Singh
Partner, Criminal Law
Introduction
In Lalita v. Vishwanath & Ors. (2025), the Supreme Court addressed an appeal against acquittal in a case involving allegations of abetment to suicide and cruelty under Sections 306 and 498A IPC.
Background
The mother of the deceased filed an appeal against the High Court's acquittal of the accused persons in a dowry death case.
On FIR Evidence
- Corroborative Value: FIR serves as corroborative evidence, not substantive
- First Information: Importance of prompt lodging of FIR
- Consistency: Inconsistencies between FIR and testimony affect credibility
Practical Implications
This judgment guides prosecutors and investigators on the proper use of FIR as evidence and the importance of consistency in criminal proceedings.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein may not be applicable to all situations and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Please consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal advice regarding your situation.
